Nobles v. Colvin, 2:15-cv-02525-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160525a22
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 45 days to July 7, 2016, for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension for filing of the Opening Brief, which is requested because of Plaintiff
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 45 days to July 7, 2016, for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension for filing of the Opening Brief, which is requested because of Plaintiff'..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 45 days to July 7, 2016, for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension for filing of the Opening Brief, which is requested because of Plaintiff's counsel's recent poor health and family reasons, which have caused a backlog in her workload.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
