Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ESCOBEDO v. HUSSAIN, 1:15-cv-00434-BAM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150605916 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for June 17, 2015; WHEREAS, a clerk's default was entered against defendant Safwan Hussain dba Primo Mini Mart on May 22, 2015 (Dkt. 14); WHEREAS, a joint scheduling report must be filed by June 10, 2015 by all parties who have appeared in the action pursuant to the Court's Order Setting Mandatory Schedul
More

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for June 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, a clerk's default was entered against defendant Safwan Hussain dba Primo Mini Mart on May 22, 2015 (Dkt. 14);

WHEREAS, a joint scheduling report must be filed by June 10, 2015 by all parties who have appeared in the action pursuant to the Court's Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Dkt. 3);

WHEREAS, Defendants, Kenneth A. Bocchini and Susan L. Bocchini, Trustees of the Kenneth A. and Susan L. Bocchini Family Trust (collectively "Defendants") are in the process of obtaining a Certified Access Specialist Report for the Facility and will provide it to Plaintiff, Jose Escobedo ("Plaintiff," and together with Defendants, "the Parties"), and the Parties anticipate using the report as a basis to reach an informal resolution of Plaintiff's equitable claims;

WHEREAS, the Parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions and are optimistically hopeful that a full settlement can be reached within the next six weeks;

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to conserve judicial resources and avoid incurring additional attorney fees and costs;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for June 17, 2015 to a date at the Court's convenience on or after July 15, 2015, to allow time for the Parties to exhaust settlement efforts.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for June 17, 2015 is continued to August 19, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The Parties shall file a joint scheduling report one week prior to the Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer