U.S. v. ORTIZ, 2:15-cr-124 KJM (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160620621
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND DROPPING MATTER FROM CALENDAR ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Christiaan Highsmith, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant John W. Ortiz that the conditions of his pretrial release be modified to terminate condition No. 15 in Case Number 2:15-cr-209 GEB that he be subject to electronic monitoring and curfew. T
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND DROPPING MATTER FROM CALENDAR ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Christiaan Highsmith, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant John W. Ortiz that the conditions of his pretrial release be modified to terminate condition No. 15 in Case Number 2:15-cr-209 GEB that he be subject to electronic monitoring and curfew. Th..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE AND DROPPING MATTER FROM CALENDAR
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Christiaan Highsmith, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant John W. Ortiz that the conditions of his pretrial release be modified to terminate condition No. 15 in Case Number 2:15-cr-209 GEB that he be subject to electronic monitoring and curfew.
The court is advised that counsel for both parties conferred with each other and with the assigned Pretrial Services Officer and all are in agreement that this modification is appropriate at this time. The court is further advised that the Pretrial Services Officer confirmed to defense counsel, both orally and by email to both attorneys that Mr. Ortiz was doing very will in all the particulars represented to the court in the motion filed on Mr. Ortiz' behalf.
On that basis the court is requested to sign the proposed order granting the requested relief, and upon doing so, to drop this matter from this court's duty calendar for June 17, 2016.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
