Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Nunez, 2:17-CR-00155-MCE. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180720808 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on July 12, 2018. 2. The matter was then continued, by the Court's own motion, to July 19, 2018. 3. By this stipulation, the parties move to continue the status conference until September 27, 2018, and to exclude time between July 19, 2018 and September 27, 2018, under Local Code T4.
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on July 12, 2018.

2. The matter was then continued, by the Court's own motion, to July 19, 2018.

3. By this stipulation, the parties move to continue the status conference until September 27, 2018, and to exclude time between July 19, 2018 and September 27, 2018, under Local Code T4.

4. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) The government has represented that it has produced discovery in the form of investigative reports, photographs, and audio files, which the defendants need time to review, discuss with their counsel, and pursue investigation. The government has also represented that it has made available to defense counsel additional electronic surveillance discovery, which the defendants will also need time to review. b) Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. c) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. d) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of July 19, 2018 to September 27, 2018, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

5. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

Time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including September 27, 2018, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). It is further ordered that the July 19, 2018 status conference shall be continued until September 27, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer