Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MOORE v. BAILEY, 1:14-CV-00205-LJO-BAM. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140603893 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2014
Summary: THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALAN BAILEY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Alan Bailey, ("Defendant"), stipulated to an extension of time wherein Defendant's response to the Complaint is currently due on or before June 2, 2014; WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff are still engaged in meaningful settlement negotiations and actually nearing Settlement (including revie
More

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALAN BAILEY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Alan Bailey, ("Defendant"), stipulated to an extension of time wherein Defendant's response to the Complaint is currently due on or before June 2, 2014;

WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff are still engaged in meaningful settlement negotiations and actually nearing Settlement (including reviewing/revising Settlement Agreement language), and wish to avoid incurring additional fees and unnecessarily utilizing judicial resources while Defendant and Plaintiff finalize the Settlement Agreement terms as between them;

WHEREAS, defendant, Metro Unlimited Wireless, Inc. ("Metro"), does not object to extending the time for Bailey to respond to Plaintiff's complaint and is also in meaningful settlement negotiations with Plaintiff;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, Defendant and Metro, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to an additional extension of time (i.e., a third extension which, in total, exceeds 28 days) for Defendant Bailey to respond to the Complaint herein, through and including June 20, 2014, which third extension exceeds the maximum 28 days permissible without leave of Court.

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's response to the Complaint herein is now due on or before June 20, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer