Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

California River Watch v. County of Fresno, 1:14-cv-1501-MJS. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150513740 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)] MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH and defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO, by and through their counsel of record, that the above-captioned action, as to all parties and all causes of action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party hereto to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The parties warrant that they have each authorized their respective counsel t
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP § 41(a)(1)(ii)]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH and defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO, by and through their counsel of record, that the above-captioned action, as to all parties and all causes of action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party hereto to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The parties warrant that they have each authorized their respective counsel to sign this Stipulation For Dismissal on their behalf.

In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Jack Silver, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from each of the signatories to this document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of May, 2015.

ORDER

Based on the parties' Stipulation for dismissal under F.R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), this Court DISMISSES with prejudice this entire action and all claims; and DIRECTS the Clerk to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer