STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY UNTIL JUNE 12, 2017

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff California River Watch ("Plaintiff") and Defendants John D. Sweeney and Point Buckler Club, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) (collectively "Defendants) hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff served Defendants with (1) Plaintiff's First Requests For Admission to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, (2) Plaintiff's First Request For Production of Documents and ESI to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, and (3) Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney.

2. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides, in pertinent part, that "Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that: . . . (b) other procedures governing or limiting discovery be modified—but a stipulation extending the time for any form of discovery must have court approval if it would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion, or for trial."

3. On February 24, 2017, the Court took under submission Defendants' motion to dismiss, and set a case management conference for June 8, 2017.

4. In light of Defendants' pending motion, which if granted would moot Plaintiff's discovery requests, and the scheduled case management conference, the parties hereby stipulate to extend until June 12, 2017 Defendants time to respond to the discovery requests listed in paragraph 1 above.

5. This stipulation will not interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion, or for trial, because there are no such dates currently set.

IT IS SO ORDERED.