Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TEESPRING, INC. v. PUETZ, 15-cv-04149-VC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170501j80 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 129, 134, 142, 143, 145, 146, 147. VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . For the reasons given at the pretrial conference, the follow rulings apply to the pretrial motions: The motions to amend Teespring and Maginnis's counter-claim answers are granted. Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 1 is unopposed and is granted. Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 2 to exclude evidence of willfulness is granted. The Court is continuing to co
More

ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 129, 134, 142, 143, 145, 146, 147.

For the reasons given at the pretrial conference, the follow rulings apply to the pretrial motions:

The motions to amend Teespring and Maginnis's counter-claim answers are granted.

Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 1 is unopposed and is granted.

Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 2 to exclude evidence of willfulness is granted. The Court is continuing to consider the admissibility of the emails between Teespring and Maginnis for their potential relevance to infringement. See Dkt. No. 120.

Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 3 on evidence of access is denied.

Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 4 on the copyright certificate is denied.

Teespring and Maginnis's Motion in Limine No. 5 on the slogan "I'm the Infidel Allah

Warned You About" is granted to the extent that Puetz might argue that the words of the slogan are copyrightable on their own and is otherwise denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer