King v. AT&T, Corp., 3:16-cv-04853-VC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180215a21
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court, having considered the submissions of Plaintiff Conway King (collectively, "Named Plaintiff") and Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company ("Pac Bell") 1 (together, "the Parties"), and having considered the oral presentation by counsel for all Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, this Court orders as follows: 1. The individual causes of action of Plaintiff Conway King are hereby dismissed with prejudice
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court, having considered the submissions of Plaintiff Conway King (collectively, "Named Plaintiff") and Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company ("Pac Bell") 1 (together, "the Parties"), and having considered the oral presentation by counsel for all Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, this Court orders as follows: 1. The individual causes of action of Plaintiff Conway King are hereby dismissed with prejudice;..
More
PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the submissions of Plaintiff Conway King (collectively, "Named Plaintiff") and Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company ("Pac Bell")1 (together, "the Parties"), and having considered the oral presentation by counsel for all Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, this Court orders as follows:
1. The individual causes of action of Plaintiff Conway King are hereby dismissed with prejudice;
2. The class allegations asserted in the operative complaint in this action are dismissed without prejudice to any unnamed class members;
3. Defendant shall give notice of this dismissal to the Communications Workers of America: Local 9400;
4. Defendant shall file proof of service of such notice of the dismissal of this action on the Communications Workers of America: Local 9400 within fourteen (14) days of entry of the Order dismissing the action; and
5. Each of the Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Parties previously agreed that Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company erroneously was sued as "AT&T Corp." See Larson v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Case No. 3:16-cv-04858-VC (ECF 12, 20, 40).
Source: Leagle
