Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moore v. Pet Supermarket, Inc., 2:13-cv-01478 DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150218878 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2) DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: Plaintiff, DARRELL MOORE, by and through his attorneys of record, and Defendant PET SUPERMARKET, INC., by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2)

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

Plaintiff, DARRELL MOORE, by and through his attorneys of record, and Defendant PET SUPERMARKET, INC., by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer