Filed: Oct. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY KENDALL J. NEWMAN , District Judge . On June 28, 2016, based on the parties' stipulation, the court entered an order extending the time for filing of Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment and Defendants' reply. On May 20, 2016, the court appointed Rebecca A. Weinstein-Hamilton as co-counsel to represent Pla
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY KENDALL J. NEWMAN , District Judge . On June 28, 2016, based on the parties' stipulation, the court entered an order extending the time for filing of Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment and Defendants' reply. On May 20, 2016, the court appointed Rebecca A. Weinstein-Hamilton as co-counsel to represent Plai..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, District Judge.
On June 28, 2016, based on the parties' stipulation, the court entered an order extending the time for filing of Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment and Defendants' reply.
On May 20, 2016, the court appointed Rebecca A. Weinstein-Hamilton as co-counsel to represent Plaintiff for the limited purpose of opposing Defendants' motions for summary judgment.
Due to the length of time it took to obtain Plaintiff's expert evaluation, it has become necessary to get an extension of time up to November 30, 2016, to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment.
The parties agree that the time for Plaintiff to file his opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be extended to November 30, 2016. The parties agree that Defendants' reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff's opposition to the motions for summary judgment.
The parties stipulate that an extension of time up to November 30, 2016, for Plaintiff to file his oppositions to the motions for summary judgment will not significantly impact the progress of this case or prejudice the Defendants. This request is not brought for any improper purpose.
Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record —Rebecca E. Ihejirika; and Defendants — Dr. Athannasious, Dr. Weiland and Dr. Bick by and through their attorney — Deputy Attorney General — Kevin W. Reager, together with Defendant — Dr. Khaira by and through his attorney — Theodore D. Poppinga, hereby stipulate that the Court grant the said parties an extension of the deadline by which Plaintiff shall file his oppositions to the motions for summary judgment and the Defendants' shall file their reply.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record —Rebecca E. Ihejirika, and Defendants — Dr. Athannasious, Dr. Weiland and Dr. Bick by and through their attorney — Deputy Attorney General — Kevin W. Reager, together with Defendant — Dr. Khaira by and through his attorney — Theodore D. Poppinga hereby request as follows:
(1) The deadline for Plaintiff to file his Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment is extended up to and including, November 30, 2016.
(2) The Defendants' reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff's Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.) Plaintiff Milton Sykes shall file his Oppositions to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment on or before November 30, 2016.
2.) Defendants' Reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff's Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment.
