Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A.P. v. Community Care Licensing, 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160713b42 Visitors: 127
Filed: Jul. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2016
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN AN EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated January 20, 2016 [ECF No. 63], be modified to reflect new deadlines as follows, or as to accommodate the Court's docket, in order for the parties
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN AN EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated January 20, 2016 [ECF No. 63], be modified to reflect new deadlines as follows, or as to accommodate the Court's docket, in order for the parties to participate in an early settlement conference:

Current Date New Date Expert Disclosure: July 15, 2016 Oct. 17, 2016 Supplemental Expert Disclosure: July 29, 2016 Oct. 31, 2016 Close of All Discovery: Sept. 16, 2016 Nov. 21, 2016 Filing of Dispositive Motions: Oct. 18, 2016 Dec. 21, 2016 Hearing of Dispositive Motions: Nov. 15, 2016 Jan. 24, 2017, at 1:30p Joint Pretrial Statement: Jan. 6, 2017 June 2, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference: Jan. 13, 2017 June 9, 2017 at 11:00a Trial: Feb. 13, 2017 July 17, 2017

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have met and discussed the posture of this case, and agree that it would be in the interests of justice and judicial economy and that good causes exists for the modification of the scheduling order;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to participate in a judicially supervised settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Carolyn Delaney on September 9, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., and allowing the parties to extend the deadlines as requested will save the parties time and expenses while they pursue potential settlement;

WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other improper purpose;

WHEREAS, continuing the trial date and pretrial deadlines will not prejudice any party or their counsel; and

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties that this Court modifies the pretrial deadlines and trial date as set forth above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer