King County v. Viracon, Inc., 19-508. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190715c06
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26(a)(1) BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . After reviewing the joint Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Parties to Exchange Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1), and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulated Motion For Extension Of Time is GRANTED. The Parties shall provide their proposed phased plan for initial disclo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26(a)(1) BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . After reviewing the joint Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Parties to Exchange Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1), and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulated Motion For Extension Of Time is GRANTED. The Parties shall provide their proposed phased plan for initial disclos..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26(a)(1)
BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
After reviewing the joint Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Parties to Exchange Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1), and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulated Motion For Extension Of Time is GRANTED.
The Parties shall provide their proposed phased plan for initial disclosures in their forthcoming Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan, and the dates of initial disclosures will be included in the resultant Scheduling Order.
Source: Leagle
