KENLY KIYA KATO, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) by and between Plaintiffs DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Jonathan L. Waber (collectively, "Plaintiffs") on the one hand, and Defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. ("Defendants") on the other hand, (each a "Party" and, together, the "Parties"), through their respective attorneys of record that a Protective Order ("Order" or "Stipulated Protective Order") may be entered by the Court in this action for good cause as follows:
Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge that disclosure and discovery activity in this litigation will involve production of confidential, proprietary, trade secret, medical, psychological, personal or private information for which special protection from public dissemination or disclosure (and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting and defending this matter) would be warranted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), Local Rule 79-5, and any other applicable local laws and rules, the Parties wish to facilitate the orderly and efficient disclosure of relevant information, and to minimize the potential for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.
The Parties acknowledge that any use of information or items deemed "Protected Material" pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order at trial or in other court hearings or proceedings shall be governed exclusively by the orders of the presiding judge. The Parties further acknowledge that the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order do not apply to or operate to constrain in any way the Court or the Court's personnel, who are subject only to the Court's internal procedures regarding the handling of any material filed or lodged with the Court, including, without limitation, material filed or lodged under seal. The Parties also acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items deemed "Protected Material" as that term is defined below.
Counsel for Plaintiffs DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Jonathan L. Waber (the "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (the "Defendants") have conferred on the issue of disclosure of certain information relevant to the claims and defenses in the above-captioned action. The Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed that both sides either have propounded or will propound discovery seeking information and documents related to, inter alia, confidential, proprietary, trade secret, medical, psychological, personal or private information. Good cause exists pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect those involved in this litigation from the disclosure of such information without adequate safeguards in place regarding confidentiality.
Means any hardcopy or electronic document, information, testimony (i.e., depositions, declarations, or other pre-trial statements in this Litigation), and all copies, data, extracts, compilations, summaries, reports, and information obtained, derived, or generated from such material that the party designating the material as confidential reasonably believes to be entitled to confidential treatment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), Local Rule 79-5, or other applicable laws or regulations. Confidential material includes, but is not limited to, trade secrets (as defined in the Uniform Trade Secrets Act); other confidential or proprietary research, development, or commercial information; all information that, if disclosed, could result in competitive, commercial, or business harm; and any person's personal identifying information, financial information, medical/insurance information, or other information that is private under applicable laws or regulations.
Extremely sensitive information that the Disclosing Party considers in good faith to contain or comprise information covered by paragraph 2.3 above, but that is so highly sensitive or confidential that disclosure to a Party would pose a substantial risk of impairing the personal, business or commercial interests of the Designating Party or others subject to Rule 26(c) or under other applicable laws.
The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel in this action or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as requiring disclosure of documents, information or any other materials that are subject to applicable privilege or immunities or that are, or may be claimed to be, otherwise beyond the scope of permissible discovery. Nothing herein shall be construed as an admission or concession by any party that any Protected Material constitutes relevant, material, or admissible evidence in this matter.
The parties to this Stipulated Protective Order intend that the protections conferred by the designation of material as "Protected Material" shall apply to any documents produced in this litigation so designated, regardless of whether or not this Order has been entered by the Court. Further, the parties agree to "meet and confer" in good faith after the conclusion of the subject litigation (if not before) to ensure that "Protected Material" does not become part of the "public record."
Each Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards, including, when reasonable, designating for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications which qualify for protection under this Order.
If it comes to a Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. This, however, does not preclude a Designating Party from designating Protected Material previously produced in this action prior to the Parties' entry of this Stipulated Protective Order.
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
(i) Documents Produced in Image, PDF, or hardcopy form ("Image"). The Designating Party shall place on each page the following legend: PROTECTED DOCUMENT, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or PROTECTED DOCUMENT—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. The legend shall not obscure any content of the original document. Any person making a copy of the image, if authorized under this Order, shall ensure that the same legend shows on the copy.
(ii) Documents Produced in Native Format ("native file"). A Designating Party shall rename each native file to include, at the end of the file name and prior to the file extension, the following language: PROTECTED or PROTECTED—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY. Any person making any copy of the native file, if authorized under this Order, shall not rename the file.
The Designating Party may designate information disclosed on the record at the deposition, including testimony and exhibits, as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" and request the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. Such separate transcript shall include both deposition testimony and exhibits so designated. In addition, deposition transcripts and exhibits shall be deemed confidential for thirty (30) days after the Parties' receipt of the final transcript. A Designating Party may designate in writing, within thirty (30) days after receipt of any final deposition transcript in the action, the specific pages of the transcript and exhibits to be treated as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." The Designating Party shall then be responsible to notify the Court Reporter and the Court Reporter shall provide a separate transcript which shall include both deposition testimony and exhibits so designated.
Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as instructed by the Party offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.
A Designating Party may designate information disclosed in response to written discovery requests (including subpoenas) as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" by so indicating in said responses, on each page of any documents produced with such responses, and/or as otherwise provided in Paragraph 5.2 above, identifying those responses being so designated. In addition, a Designating Party may designate in writing, within thirty (30) days after receipt of another Party or non-party's responses to written discovery requests, the specific responses, documents, and/or other information to be treated as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY."
The Producing Party shall affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the infonnation or item is stored the legend Pally shall affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the items the legend "CONFIDENTIAL, PRODUCED BY [PARTY NAME] IN DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. V. STRYKER CORP., CASE NO. 5:18-cv-01557" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY EYES ONLY, PRODUCED BY [PARTY NAME] IN DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. V STRYKER CORP., CASE NO. 5:18-cv-01557." If only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as "CONFIDENTIAL" or as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY."
For 30 days after a non-party makes disclosures in this proceeding, the entire disclosure shall be treated as Protected Material under this Order.
Within the 30-day period, the non-party or a party in this action may notify all other parties that all or specific portions of the disclosure are Protected Material. Thereafter, the designated portions shall remain subject to this Order.
An inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection wider this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
A Party may challenge the propriety of any designation of any Discovery Disclosure or Discovery Material made pursuant to this Order. The challenge shall be made within forty-five (45) days of the challenging party's receipt of the material to be challenged and at a time that is consistent with the Court's Scheduling Order. A challenge may be made by serving by e-mail on all other Parties (and third parties, if applicable) a "Notice of Objection" that identifies with particularity the Protected Material as to which the designation is challenged and states the basis for each challenge.
If such a motion is timely filed, the original designation shall remain effective until the later of: (i) flinty (30) comt days after service of notice of entry of an order redesignating the materials, or (ii) an appellate court's ruling on any timely filed writ petition.
A Receiving Party may use Protected Material only for purposes of prosecuting and defending this action. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the Court and its employees or other staff (e.g., externs) and to the categories of persons described in this Stipulated Protective Order. When the litigation has been concluded, a Receiving Party shall comply with the provisions of Paragraphs 4, 8, 9 and 13.
(i) This provision does not preclude the Designating Party from objecting to or moving to preclude disclosure to any witness, or from seeking amendment of this provision in the future;
(a) Protected Material shall not be disclosed to anyone for any purpose other than as required for the preparation of trial or any appeal in this action, and, in that limited context, shall be disclosed only to Qualified Persons as set out below. Protected Material shall not be used for any business, competitive or other non-litigation purpose.
(i) Protected Material in native format may be copied solely (a) for use in a litigation-support application or (b) as mutually agreed upon by the parties.
(b) Each Party and its counsel, and each Qualified Person identified in ¶¶ 6.3 and 6.4 (other than the Court), including any person or entity acting on behalf of, or for the benefit of, that Qualified Person, (i) shall not permit or enable unauthorized dissemination of Protected Material to anyone; (ii) shall take all necessary and prudent measures to preserve the security of Protected Material, including measures to minimize risks of hacking of, and other imauthorized access to, systems on which Protected Material is stored or tluough which it is transmitted; and (iii) shall physically store, maintain, and transmit Protected Material solely within the United States.
(c) If Protected Material is disclosed in a maimer not authorized by this Order, or if an attempt is made to hack or otherwise gain unauthorized access to a system containing Protected Material (jointly, "unauthorized actions"), each Party or Qualified Person with knowledge of the unauthorized actions inunediately shall take necessary and prudent remedial measures to prevent their reoccurrence and promptly shall infonn the Designating Pally of such remedial measures and of all facts relating to the unauthorized actions, including identification of all Protected Material disclosed.
(d) Nothing in this Order shall limit any Designating Party's use of its own documents, including disclosure of its own Protected Material to any person for any purpose.
Prior to any discovery-related disclosure or production, the Producing Party may redact information or material that is protected from disclosure by applicable privilege or immunity, that is governed by any applicable privacy law or regulation, that contains commercially sensitive or proprietary non-responsive information, or that any Order entered in this Action allows to be redacted. The Producing Party also may withhold entire non-responsive attachments in a document family and may produce slipsheets in their place.
Nothing in this Order shall limit any Designating Party's use of its own documents and information, including Protected Material, in this action or otherwise. Such disclosure shall not affect any designations made pursuant to the terms of this Order so long as the disclosure is made in a manner that is reasonably calculated to maintain the confidentiality of the information.
If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," the Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party's Outside Counsel in writing sent by e-mail immediately and in no event more than seven business days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order, the identification of the Protected Material(s) which the Receiving Party believes to be implicated by the subpoena or order, and must indicate the basis or bases by which the Receiving Party believes that the identified documents are subject to disclosure.
The Receiving Party must also immediately inform, in writing, the party causing the subpoena or order to issue that some or all responsive material is subject to this Protective Order. A copy of this Stipulated Protective Order shall be included therewith.
The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued.
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circiunstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to recover all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request that such person or persons to return and/or destroy
The production of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other privilege or protection from disclosure is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. If information is produced in discovery that is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as a trial-preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that receiving such information of such claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a Party must promptly return or destroy the specified information and any copies it has and may not sequester, use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved. When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Ruel of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discoveiy order that provides for productions without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and €, insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the court.
If the Receiving Party receives documents, ESI, or other forms of information from the Producing Party that, upon inspection or review, appear in any respect to contain or constitute potentially privileged information, the Receiving Party shall inunediately stop review of such information, shall not distribute it fiuther even amongst the Party's own case team except as strictly necessary to confirm the privileged nature of its contents, promptly sequester the potentially privileged information, and immediately identify the potentially privileged information to the Producing Party.
The Receiving Party may object to the Producing Party's designation of disclosed information as privileged material by providing written notice of such objection within seven days of its receipt of a written demand for the return of the disclosed privileged material. The Parties will strictly comply with Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 in connection with any dispute regarding the designation of information as privileged material. If the Parties are unable to resolve any such dispute, the issue shall be resolved by the Count after an in camera review of the disclosed privileged material. However, the Receiving Pally agrees not to argue in coimection with a dispute over privileged material that the information may not have been reviewed by the Producing Party prior to its disclosure or that the Producing Pally did not take reasonable steps to prevent disclosure. Pending resolution of any such dispute by the Court, the Receiving Party shall not review and shall not use the disclosed privileged material in any respect.
This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence ("FRE") 502(d). FRE 502(b) is inapplicable to any disclosed privileged material. Under FRE 502(d) and 28 U.S. Code § 1738, this Order shall be enforceable and granted full faith and credit in all other state and federal proceedings. Any subsequent conflict of law analysis shall apply the law most protective of privilege and work product.
Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's light to conduct a review and segregation for withholding from production documents, ESI or information (including metadata) on the basis of relevance or responsiveness to discovery requests, or that is privileged material.
All Patties reserve the right to seek modification of this Order at any time for good cause, including obtaining appropriate orders for deponents who refuse to sign the attached Certification (i.e. Exhibit A). The Parties agree to meet and confer prior to seeking to modify this Order for any reason. The restrictions imposed by this Order may only be modified or terminated by written stipulation of all Parties or by order of Court. No Party shall be prejudiced in any way of its right to petition the Court for a fiuther protective order relating to any purportedly confidential information. Nothing in this Order Shall prevent any Party from seeking additional Protective Orders or other appropriate relief with respect to the scope of discovery and/or any discovery requests, depositions, and/or portions thereof that such Party believes to be inappropriate, harassing, or otherwise impermissible under applicable law.
By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object, on any ground, to use in evidence of any Protected Material.
Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5.2. In the event that a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the Court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court.
A Party's compliance with the obligations imposed on it by this Order, including any obligations concerning the treatment of information designated as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," shall not be deemed an admission by the complying Party or otherwise be evidence that the information so designated is confidential, proprietary, trade secret, or private information. Nor shall such compliance be deemed a waiver of the complying Party's right to challenge the Designating Party's designation of Protected Material as "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY."
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a core order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL," that Party must:
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material — and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this litigation, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, simunaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Producing Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), I, Anthony B. Haller, hereby certify that the content of this dociunent is acceptable to D. Joshua Salinas, counsel for Defendants, and that Mr. Salinas has provided his authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.
I, ___________________ [print or type full name], of ______________________________________________[print or type full address], have received a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "Court") in the matter DePuy Svnthes Sales. Inc. et al. v. Sinker Corporation, Case No. 5:18-cv-01557 FIVIO (KKx). I certify that I am not a Competitor, as defined in the Stipulated Protective Order. I have read the Stipulated Protective Order in its entirety, understand it, and I agree to comply with it fully and to be bound by all of it terms.
I understand any violation of the Stipulated Protective Order may subject me to sanctions by the Court, in addition to any other remedies that a Party may have. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of enforcing the Stipulated Protective Order, whether during the action or after its conclusion
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.