JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ICE Consulting, Inc. ("ICE"); Uzair Sattar ("Sattar"); and Derick Needham (collectively, "Plaintiffs"); and Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen ("Defendant") (Plaintiffs and Defendant shall be referred to individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys, file this stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and agree that: (a) all claims or causes of action that were asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendant in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 33) in the above-entitled action ("Action") are to be dismissed with prejudice; (b) all claims or causes of action which were asserted by Defendant against Plaintiffs in the Counterclaim(s) (Dkt. No. 62) in the Action are to be dismissed with prejudice; (c) each Party is to bear its own attorneys'fees and costs (except to the extent agreed to in writing otherwise); (d) each Party waives its right to appeal from the Court's Order entered pursuant to this Stipulation; and (e) this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement Agreement as set forth in its February 6, 2017 Order (Dkt. No. 107) retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement Agreement entered into by the Parties.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice, and Good Cause Appearing,

IT IS SO ORDERED that:

1. All claims or causes of action that were asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendant in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 33) in the above-entitled action ("Action") are hereby dismissed with prejudice;

2. All claims or causes of action which were asserted by Defendant against Plaintiffs in the Counterclaim(s) (Dkt. No. 62) in the Action are hereby dismissed with prejudice;

3. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys'fees and costs (except to the extent agreed to in writing otherwise);

4. Each Party waives its right to appeal from this Order;

5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement Agreement as set forth in its February 6, 2017 Order (Dkt. No. 107) retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement Agreement entered into by the Parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED.