U.S. v. Maupin, CR 19-0068 RS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190501c27
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO MAY 14, 2019 RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . On April 2, 2019, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned case, and set a further status date for May 7, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. Undersigned counsel for the Government unfortunately now has an unforeseen conflict at that time. The parties, moreover, are engaged in plea discussions and there could be a resolution reached by the next status conference. Defense counsel has cons
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO MAY 14, 2019 RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . On April 2, 2019, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned case, and set a further status date for May 7, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. Undersigned counsel for the Government unfortunately now has an unforeseen conflict at that time. The parties, moreover, are engaged in plea discussions and there could be a resolution reached by the next status conference. Defense counsel has conse..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO MAY 14, 2019
RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge.
On April 2, 2019, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned case, and set a further status date for May 7, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. Undersigned counsel for the Government unfortunately now has an unforeseen conflict at that time. The parties, moreover, are engaged in plea discussions and there could be a resolution reached by the next status conference. Defense counsel has consented to continuing the status conference for one week to May 14, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the May 7, 2019, hearing be continued until May 14, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. The parties further stipulate and jointly request that the Court find that time is properly excludable under the Speedy Trial Act in the interest of justice and for continuity of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
