SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools Co., 2:18-cv-02088-GMN-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190103a91
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2018, plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Complaint (ECF No. 1) and its Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 2 & 3). The parties previously stipulated to, and an order [ECF 14] was granted providing that defendant Zhejiang R
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On October 31, 2018, plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Complaint (ECF No. 1) and its Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 2 & 3). The parties previously stipulated to, and an order [ECF 14] was granted providing that defendant Zhejiang Ro..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST]
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
On October 31, 2018, plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Complaint (ECF No. 1) and its Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 2 & 3).
The parties previously stipulated to, and an order [ECF 14] was granted providing that defendant Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools Co., LTD dba AeroPro would file its answer to plaintiff's complaint or motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure not later than December 28, 2018.
The parties now stipulate that due to the schedules of counsel during the holiday season, and in light of the court's request for supplemental briefing on and continuance of the final hearing on plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief to February 12, 2019, defendant may file its response to plaintiff's complaint up to and including February 22, 2019, ten days following the scheduled preliminary injunction hearing. This is the second stipulation for extension of plaintiff's response time.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Defendant's answer to Plaintiff's Complaint or motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is due February 22, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
