Insight Global, LLC v. Beacon Hill Staffing Group, LLC, 17-cv-00309-BLF. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190110997
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S NON-DISPOSITIVE PRE-TRIAL ORDER [Re: ECF 47] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Order of Magistrate Judge (ECF 46). ECF 47. A magistrate judge's non-dispositive pre-trial order may be modified or set aside if it is "clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). "[T]he magistrate's factual determinations are reviewed for
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S NON-DISPOSITIVE PRE-TRIAL ORDER [Re: ECF 47] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Order of Magistrate Judge (ECF 46). ECF 47. A magistrate judge's non-dispositive pre-trial order may be modified or set aside if it is "clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). "[T]he magistrate's factual determinations are reviewed for c..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S NON-DISPOSITIVE PRE-TRIAL ORDER
[Re: ECF 47]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Order of Magistrate Judge (ECF 46). ECF 47. A magistrate judge's non-dispositive pre-trial order may be modified or set aside if it is "clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). "[T]he magistrate's factual determinations are reviewed for clear error, and the magistrate's legal conclusions are reviewed to determine whether they are contrary to law." Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 268 F.R.D. 344, 348 (N.D. Cal. 2010).
Having reviewed Defendant's motion and the magistrate judge's pre-trial order (ECF 46), the Court finds no "clear error" in the magistrate judge's factual determinations and does not find that the magistrate judge's legal conclusions are "contrary to law." See Perry, 268 F.R.D. at 348. Accordingly, Defendant's motion at ECF 47 is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
