Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jimenez v. Tsai, 5:16-cv-04434-EJD. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180924582 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs ISMAEL JIMENEZ, YOLANDA JIMENEZ, ANGELES JIMENEZ, ANTONIO JIMENEZ, CARMENTINA HERRERA, EBARISTO ALAVEZ, JOSEFA JIMENEZ, JESUCITA ORTIZ, RODOLFO ROBLES, and PROJECT SENTINEL ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants DAVID TSAI, UNDINE TSAI and SHANG SHEN (collectively, "Defendants") by and through their respective attorneys of
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs ISMAEL JIMENEZ, YOLANDA JIMENEZ, ANGELES JIMENEZ, ANTONIO JIMENEZ, CARMENTINA HERRERA, EBARISTO ALAVEZ, JOSEFA JIMENEZ, JESUCITA ORTIZ, RODOLFO ROBLES, and PROJECT SENTINEL ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants DAVID TSAI, UNDINE TSAI and SHANG SHEN (collectively, "Defendants") by and through their respective attorneys of record that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Each side will be responsible for and bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer