Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Boring v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 2:13-cv-01404-GEB-CMK. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150128h18 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND TRIAL RELATED DEADLINES GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Carthel Dennis Boring ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Bank of America, N.A. ("Defendants") (collectively Plaintiffs and Defendant may be referred to as the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agrees as follows, subject to the Court's approval. RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on April 16, 2014, the trial issued a Scheduling Order in this
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND TRIAL RELATED DEADLINES

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Carthel Dennis Boring ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Bank of America, N.A. ("Defendants") (collectively Plaintiffs and Defendant may be referred to as the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agrees as follows, subject to the Court's approval.

RECITALS

1. WHEREAS, on April 16, 2014, the trial issued a Scheduling Order in this matter: 2. WHEREAS, following, the Court's Scheduling Order, the parties have been diligently engaging in discovery, by propounding written discovery and noticing the depositions of pertinent witnesses; 3. WHEREAS, following the Court's Order, Defendant began reviewing Plaintiff for a loan modification in an attempt to resolve this matter without the need for further litigation and a final decision has not yet been made by Defendant; 4. WHEREAS additional time is needed to process Plaintiff's loan modification application; 5. WHEREAS the parties have not previously requested an extension of time on any of the discovery or trial related deadlines 6. WHEREAS trial in this matter is currently scheduled for November 3, 2015 7. WHEREAS, in an attempt to continue pursuing settlement negotiations without the need to expend exorbitant litigation expenses, the Parties wish to extend the following discovery and trial related deadlines as follows: a. Fact discovery cutoff July 6, 2015 b. Designation of experts with reports July 6, 2015 c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports July 20, 2015 d. Expert discovery cutoff August 14, 2015 e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions August 17, 2015 f. Final Pretrial Conference September 7, 2015 at 2:30 p.m.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO that

1. The following discovery and trial related deadlines shall be continued as follows:: a. Fact discovery cutoff July 6, 2015 b. Designation of experts with reports July 6, 2015 c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports July 20, 2015 d. Expert discovery cutoff August 14, 2015 e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions August 17, 2015 f. Final Pretrial Conference September 7, 2015 at 2:30 p.m.

PROPOSED ORDER

The Court, having read the above-stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The following discovery and trial related deadlines shall be continued as follows: a. Fact discovery cutoffJuly 6, 2015 b. Designation of experts with reports July 6, 2015 c. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports July 20, 2015 d. Expert discovery cutoff August 14, 2015 e. Last day for hearing on dispositive motions August 24, 2015 f. Final Pretrial Conference October 26, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.. A joint pretrial statement shall be filed seven days prior to the hearing. g. Trial is rescheduled for December 1, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer