SHAW v. GOLDEN CHINA BUFFET, INC., 1:12-cv-01293-AWI-GSA. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20121212869
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants Golden China Buffet, Inc. dba Golden China Buffet aka Golden China Buffet I, Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman, Co-Trustees of the Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman Revocable Family Trust u/t/d November 18, 2010, Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen as Co-Trustees of the Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen Revocab
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants Golden China Buffet, Inc. dba Golden China Buffet aka Golden China Buffet I, Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman, Co-Trustees of the Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman Revocable Family Trust u/t/d November 18, 2010, Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen as Co-Trustees of the Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen Revocabl..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants Golden China Buffet, Inc. dba Golden China Buffet aka Golden China Buffet I, Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman, Co-Trustees of the Gordon K. Tessman and Jean A. Tessman Revocable Family Trust u/t/d November 18, 2010, Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen as Co-Trustees of the Douglas Arnold Jorissen and Kimber Lea Jorissen Revocable Trust Agreement u/t/a August 12, 2010 and Stacy Lane Walter, Trustee of the Stacey Lane Walter Trust u/t/d November 23, 2010, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
