Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thornton v. Berryhill, 1:16-CV-00816 (GSA). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180611501 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 28 U.S.C. 2412 ORDER DENYING PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AS MOOT (Doc. 37) GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Jenyne Ann Thornton ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of four thousand nine hundred an
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 28 U.S.C. §2412

ORDER DENYING PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AS MOOT

(Doc. 37)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Jenyne Ann Thornton ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), in the amount of four thousand nine hundred and sixty dollars and eleven cents ($4,960.11). This represents compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively "Plaintiff's counsel"), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any and all payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and costs in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, fees in the amount of four thousand nine hundred and sixty dollars and eleven cents ($4,960.11), be awarded to Plaintiff's counsel as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412(d). All payments are subject to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010) and shall be awarded in accordance with the terms of the above stipulation. Given the above stipulation, Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees filed on May 7, 2018 (Doc. 37) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer