Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Young America's Foundation v. Napolitano, 3:17-cv-02255-MMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170703919 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER In support of this Stipulation, the Parties state as follows: WHEREAS, on April 27, 2017, Plaintiffs served the Complaint on Defendants; WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated that Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint should be set
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

In support of this Stipulation, the Parties state as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2017, Plaintiffs served the Complaint on Defendants;

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated that Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint should be set for June 28, 2017;

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint, scheduled to be heard on August 25, 2017, and setting Plaintiffs' deadline to file a response on July 12, 2017, and Defendants' deadline to file a reply on July 19, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel is unavailable to appear at the August 25, 2017 hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss, as she will be traveling out of state;

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to continue the hearing on Defendants' motion to September 8, 2017, and to reset the briefing schedule whereby Plaintiffs' response is due on August 11, 2017, and Defendants' reply is due on August 25, 2017.

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference set for July 28, 2017, to September 29, 2017, along with corresponding deadlines to meet and confer and file ADR Certifications by September 8, 2017, and to file a Rule 26(f) report, complete initial disclosures, and file a case management statement by September 22, 2017;

WHEREAS, the September 4, 2017 Labor Day holiday falls on the week corresponding to the Parties' deadline to meet and confer and file ADR Certifications;

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management conference by one week to October 6, 2017, along with all corresponding deadlines.

NOW THEREFORE, in light of the personal schedules of counsel, and the intervening holidays, the parties therefore stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the August 25, 2017 hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss by two weeks, reset the briefing schedule as set forth below, and continue the September 29, 2017 initial case management conference and related deadlines by one week.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, with the approval of the Court, the following schedule should govern the case:

DATE EVENT August 11, 2017 Plaintiffs' deadline to file response to Motion to Dismiss August 25, 2017 Defendants' deadline to file reply to Plaintiffs' response September 8, 2017 Hearing on Motion to Dismiss at 9:00 a.m. September 15, 2017 Last day to meet and confer regarding Rule 26 initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; File ADR Certification File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference September 29, 2017 Last day to file Rule 26(f) report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) report and file Case Management Statement October 6, 2017 Initial Case Management Conference at 10:30 AM

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED., with the following exceptions due to the Court's schedule:

1. The hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to September 29, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.

2. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued to October 27, 2017, and all related deadlines are continued in accordance therewith.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3)

I, Bryan H. Heckenlively, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this document. I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer