Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SHIRE LLC v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., 10-CV-05467 RS. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121129b39 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2012
Summary: JOINT LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA-ELENA JAMES REQUESTING PARTIAL RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY ORDER (DOC. NO. 231); AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs and Impax jointly request that the Court amend the Court's November 26, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 231) to relieve Impax of its obligation to produce its ESI within 14 days. On November 11, 2012, the parties submitted a Joint Stipulation Resolving Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Case Management Ord
More

JOINT LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA-ELENA JAMES REQUESTING PARTIAL RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY ORDER (DOC. NO. 231); AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs and Impax jointly request that the Court amend the Court's November 26, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 231) to relieve Impax of its obligation to produce its ESI within 14 days.

On November 11, 2012, the parties submitted a Joint Stipulation Resolving Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Case Management Order (Doc. No. 227). The parties proposed extending the fact discovery cut-off from December 21, 2012, to May 3, 2012. The Court granted the parties' joint request on November 16, 2012 (Doc. No. 229).

In connection with the agreed upon extension of the discovery schedule, the parties entered into a written letter agreement settling the dispute regarding the timing of Impax's production of its ESI. The parties agreed that that Impax would substantially complete its ESI production by January 18, 2013. In light of the parties' agreement, Impax has scheduled the collection and review of its ESI to be substantially complete by January 18, 2013.

Due to lingering effects of hurricane Sandy and the Thanksgiving holiday, the Court was not informed that the parties had resolved the dispute regarding the timing of Impax's production of its ESI before the Court issued its order on November 26, 2012. The parties apologize to the Court for any inconvenience, and jointly request that the Court relieve Impax of its obligation under the Court's Order to produce its ESI within 14 days.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from counsel for Plaintiffs Shire LLC and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/).

PROPOSED ORDER

Having read the parties' joint request to amend, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS that its November 26, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 231) is hereby amended to relieve Impax of its obligation to produce its ESI within 14 days of that Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Joint Letter Re Discovery Order

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer