Deane v. Pacific Financial Group Inc., C19-722 MJP. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20200206e55
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER ON AMENDED STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISCOVERY CONTINUANCE MARSHA J. PECHMAN , Senior District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed the Amended Stipulated Motion for Discovery Continuance (Dkt. No. 40), makes the following findings: The motion contains no specific (or insufficient) facts to establish good cause for a continuance/revision and/or The motion provides no suitable explanation as to why the existing case schedule deadlines were not met. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED th
Summary: ORDER ON AMENDED STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISCOVERY CONTINUANCE MARSHA J. PECHMAN , Senior District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed the Amended Stipulated Motion for Discovery Continuance (Dkt. No. 40), makes the following findings: The motion contains no specific (or insufficient) facts to establish good cause for a continuance/revision and/or The motion provides no suitable explanation as to why the existing case schedule deadlines were not met. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED tha..
More
ORDER ON AMENDED STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISCOVERY CONTINUANCE
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, Senior District Judge.
The Court, having received and reviewed the Amended Stipulated Motion for Discovery Continuance (Dkt. No. 40), makes the following findings:
The motion contains no specific (or insufficient) facts to establish good cause for a continuance/revision and/or
The motion provides no suitable explanation as to why the existing case schedule deadlines were not met.
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the request to revise the existing case schedule is DENIED without prejudice to bring a renewed motion which cures the defects noted above and outlines a plan for meeting the revised deadlines.
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.
Source: Leagle
