PEREZ v. TLC RESIDENTIAL INC., C 15-02776 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170207892
Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Secretary's discovery letter (styled as a motion to compel) regarding defendants' responses to discovery (Dkt. Nos. 146-47). Defendants' response, which shall not exceed THREE PAGES in length, is due by FEBRUARY 13 AT NOON. A hearing on the matter is set for FEBRUARY 16 AT 8:00 A.M. THIS ORDER REMINDS DEFENSE COUNSEL IT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT FORMER DEFENSE COUNSEL A
Summary: ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Secretary's discovery letter (styled as a motion to compel) regarding defendants' responses to discovery (Dkt. Nos. 146-47). Defendants' response, which shall not exceed THREE PAGES in length, is due by FEBRUARY 13 AT NOON. A hearing on the matter is set for FEBRUARY 16 AT 8:00 A.M. THIS ORDER REMINDS DEFENSE COUNSEL IT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT FORMER DEFENSE COUNSEL AP..
More
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Secretary's discovery letter (styled as a motion to compel) regarding defendants' responses to discovery (Dkt. Nos. 146-47). Defendants' response, which shall not exceed THREE PAGES in length, is due by FEBRUARY 13 AT NOON. A hearing on the matter is set for FEBRUARY 16 AT 8:00 A.M.
THIS ORDER REMINDS DEFENSE COUNSEL IT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT FORMER DEFENSE COUNSEL APPEAR AT THE HEARING, "BY SUBPOENA IF NECESSARY" (see Dkt. No. 136).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
