Quezada De Flores v. Saul, 2:18-CV-06566 (VEB). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190927994
Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT VICTOR E. BIANCHINI , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of b
Summary: JUDGMENT VICTOR E. BIANCHINI , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of be..
More
JUDGMENT
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
