Picazo v. Kimball, Tirey, & St. John LLP, 17cv1437 JM (BGS). (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180530b64
Visitors: 32
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARD JEFFREY T. MILLER , District Judge . The parties jointly move the court to enter an order awarding Defendant Kimball, Tirey, & St. John ("KTS") attorneys' fees and costs. (Doc. No. 21.) On April 23, 2018, KTS filed a motion for attorneys' fees related to its successful anti-SLAPP and summary judgment motions. (Doc. No. 20.) To avoid the expense of further litigating the fee motion, the parties ask the court to award KTS $39,326.
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARD JEFFREY T. MILLER , District Judge . The parties jointly move the court to enter an order awarding Defendant Kimball, Tirey, & St. John ("KTS") attorneys' fees and costs. (Doc. No. 21.) On April 23, 2018, KTS filed a motion for attorneys' fees related to its successful anti-SLAPP and summary judgment motions. (Doc. No. 20.) To avoid the expense of further litigating the fee motion, the parties ask the court to award KTS $39,326.0..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARD
JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.
The parties jointly move the court to enter an order awarding Defendant Kimball, Tirey, & St. John ("KTS") attorneys' fees and costs. (Doc. No. 21.) On April 23, 2018, KTS filed a motion for attorneys' fees related to its successful anti-SLAPP and summary judgment motions. (Doc. No. 20.) To avoid the expense of further litigating the fee motion, the parties ask the court to award KTS $39,326.00 on its fee motion. The parties agree and stipulate that the hourly rates charged by KTS's counsel are reasonable and the time spent is likewise reasonable.
Based on the parties' joint motion, and good cause appearing, the court awards KTS $39,326.00 for attorneys' fees on its motion for attorneys' fees and costs, (Doc. No. 20). The court stays enforcement of this judgment for thirty (30) days after the date of entry.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
