Filed: Feb. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , Chief District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 98, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 99. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 45, is
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , Chief District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 98, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 99. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 45, is D..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. WALKER, Chief District Judge.
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 98, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 99. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 45, is DENIED. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
