Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT v. BALFOUR BEATTY INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., 13-CV-02032 WHO. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131029a98 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. This stipulation is entered into between Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. ("Balfour Beatty") and qui tam plaintiffs Bill Haley, Harry Rotz and Lew Long (collectively the "Relators"). Balfour Beatty and the Relators stipulate through counsel as follows: 1. A case management conference is currently scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on November 12, 2013. 2. The below motions by Balfour Beatty
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

This stipulation is entered into between Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. ("Balfour Beatty") and qui tam plaintiffs Bill Haley, Harry Rotz and Lew Long (collectively the "Relators"). Balfour Beatty and the Relators stipulate through counsel as follows:

1. A case management conference is currently scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on November 12, 2013.

2. The below motions by Balfour Beatty are currently scheduled to be heard at 2:00 p.m. on December 4, 2013:

(a) Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure; and

(b) Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure.

3. The Relators' oppositions to the above-referenced motions are currently due on November 1, 2013. Balfour Beatty's replies in support of the above-referenced motions are currently due on November 8, 2013.

4. Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the above briefing deadlines, motion hearings and case management conference be rescheduled as follows:

Item Proposed Rescheduled Time/Date The Relators' Oppositions Tuesday, November 12, 2013 Balfour Beatty's Replies Friday, November 22, 2013 Motion Hearings 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 Case Management Conference 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013

5. The reason for the requested enlargement of time is to allow both parties to adequately brief the issues raised by both motions and in light of other commitments, including scheduled depositions in this case.

6. There have been no previous time modifications with respect to the present motions.

7. The parties anticipate that the enlargement of time will have no appreciable effect on the schedule for the case.

8. Balfour Beatty and the Relators understand the Court normally holds case management conferences on Tuesdays. However, Balfour Beatty and the Relators request the Court hold the case management conference at the same time as the motion hearings (i.e., 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 11, 2013) in order to preserve judicial resources. If this date is not available for the Court, the parties request the Court set the case management conference for a date after December 11, 2013.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

After considering the above stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court orders as follows:

1. The hearing on Balfour Beatty's Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Or, Alternatively, For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m. on December 11, 2013.

2. The hearing on Balfour Beatty's Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Pursuant To Rule 12(c) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is rescheduled to 2:00 p.m. on December 11, 2013.

3. The Relators' oppositions to the above-referenced motions must be filed no later than November 12, 2013.

4. Balfour Beatty's replies in support of the above-referenced motions must be filed no later than November 22, 2013.

5. The case management conference is rescheduled to 2 p.m. on December 11, 2013.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer