Lanz v. McAleenan, CV 19-1626 CJC (FFM). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191112a30
Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . On August 27, 2019, Ulises Zabaleta Lanz (hereinafter "Petitioner") initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (hereinafter "Petition"). Petitioner challenged his detention and sought his release from immigration custody. On October 11, 2019, respondents filed a notice that Petitioner had been released from immigration custody and suggested that the Pe
Summary: ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . On August 27, 2019, Ulises Zabaleta Lanz (hereinafter "Petitioner") initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (hereinafter "Petition"). Petitioner challenged his detention and sought his release from immigration custody. On October 11, 2019, respondents filed a notice that Petitioner had been released from immigration custody and suggested that the Pet..
More
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
On August 27, 2019, Ulises Zabaleta Lanz (hereinafter "Petitioner") initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (hereinafter "Petition"). Petitioner challenged his detention and sought his release from immigration custody. On October 11, 2019, respondents filed a notice that Petitioner had been released from immigration custody and suggested that the Petition is now moot. The Court issued an order on October 15, 2019, requiring Petitioner to show cause why the action should not be dismissed as moot. Petitioner responded to the Court order by filing a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of this action. Because respondents have not filed an answer to the Complaint or a motion for summary judgment, the notice is sufficient in and of itself to dismiss the action without further order of this Court. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
