Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Savin v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16-CV-05627-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180523c47 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING MOTIONS FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff KATHERINE SAVIN ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (the "City"), THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO) ("ASF"), FATHER BRUCE LERY, and Cross-Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ("Regents") (together, "the parties") by and th
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING MOTIONS FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff KATHERINE SAVIN ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (the "City"), THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO) ("ASF"), FATHER BRUCE LERY, and Cross-Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ("Regents") (together, "the parties") by and through their counsel of record, jointly enter into the following stipulation:

Plaintiff has reached agreements to settle her claims against the Regents, ASF, and the City (contingent on approval by the City's Board of Supervisors).

Defendants Regents and ASF have filed motions for good faith determination of settlement, which are pending before this Court. The City will file its motion for good faith settlement no later than Monday, May 21, 2018 (collectively, the "Motions"). The purpose of the Motions is to extinguish all counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims involving the settling parties exclusively.

The parties stipulate and agree that holding one hearing date on the motions would be fair and expeditious.

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that good cause exists to set the hearing on the Motions on June 14, 2018, at 2:00 pm, with any opposition due no later than May 29, 2018. The parties agree to have the Motions heard on shortened time, and without the need for reply briefs. The parties agree that the Court may hear the motions without the need for oral argument, particularly if no oppositions are filed.

The parties are not making this request for the purposes of delay, and no party would suffer any prejudice if this stipulation were granted. Indeed, the parties believe that judicial economy can best be served by ensuring that the Motions are heard at one time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on the motions for good faith determination of settlement shall be set on June 14, 2018, and any opposition shall be due no later than May 29, 2018. It is further ORDERED that these motions can be heard on shortened time, and without the necessity of a hearing.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer