Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jafarian v. Cashcall Inc., 2:17-CV-03132-APG-(CWH). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180124e46 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to the Complaint (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with LR 7-1(a), the plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian, and defendant, CashCall, Inc., stipulate as follows: 1. On December 29, 2017, Jafarian commenced the above-captioned action through the filing of a Complaint for Damages Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681, et seq. (ECF No. 1) in this Court. Jafarian served CashCall with the com
More

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to the Complaint (First Request)

In accordance with LR 7-1(a), the plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian, and defendant, CashCall, Inc., stipulate as follows:

1. On December 29, 2017, Jafarian commenced the above-captioned action through the filing of a Complaint for Damages Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (ECF No. 1) in this Court. Jafarian served CashCall with the complaint on January 3, 2018. (ECF No. 5.) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(1)(a)(1) and 6(a)(1)(C), CashCall has up to and including January 24, 2018, to file a response to the Complaint.

2. Due to delays caused by the holidays, counsel for CashCall requested, and counsel for Jafarian agreed, to grant CashCall an extension of time up to and including February 7, 2018, to file a response to the complaint.

3. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file a response to the complaint.

4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that CashCall shall have up to and including February 7, 2018, to file a response to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer