Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC v. PITTSBURG WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC., C-12-5523-WHA-ELP. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131120f27 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1404 WILLIAM H. ALSUP, Magistrate Judge. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC, Living Essentials, LLC, and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, "Living Essentials"); Defendants Dan-Dee Company, Inc., Kevin Attiq, and Fadi Attiq (collectively, the "Dan-Dee Defendants"); third-party defendants Mario Ramirez, Camilo Ramirez
More

STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1404

WILLIAM H. ALSUP, Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC, Living Essentials, LLC, and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, "Living Essentials"); Defendants Dan-Dee Company, Inc., Kevin Attiq, and Fadi Attiq (collectively, the "Dan-Dee Defendants"); third-party defendants Mario Ramirez, Camilo Ramirez, MCR Innovations and Packaging, Inc., MCR Printing & Packaging Corp., and Naftaunited.com (collectively, the "MCR Parties"); third-party defendants Jose Navarro and One Stop Label Corporation (collectively, "the One Stop Label Parties"); third-party defendants Tradeway Int'l, Inc. d/b/a Baja Exporting, Joseph Shayota, and Adriana Shayota (collectively, the "Baja Parties"); and third-party defendants Walid Jamil, Raid Jamil, Justin Shayota, Midwest Wholesale Distributors, Inc., J.T. Wholesale, Inc., and Trimexico, Inc. (collectively, the "Midwest Parties") hereby present this stipulation to the Court to Shorten Time to Hear Living Essentials' unopposed Notice of Motion and Motion for Change of Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404.

WHEREAS, on this day, Living Essentials filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Change of Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 ("Motion");

WHEREAS Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) requires the motion to be noticed for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the motion;

ACCORDINGLY, the above-named parties, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, hereby STIPULATE to shortening the time under Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) for the hearing on Living Essentials' Motion on the following grounds:

1. Living Essentials' Motion requests that this action be transferred to the Eastern District of New York for consolidation with the first-filed, larger companion lawsuit, captioned Innovation Ventures et al. v. Ultimate One Distributing Corp. et al., 12-cv-5354 (KAM) (RLM).

2. Living Essentials could not have moved for this relief earlier than today. Until this past weekend, this case involved claims asserted by and against certain parties who were not involved in the New York action, who were not subject to jurisdiction in New York, and who would not consent to transfer: Elite Wholesale, Inc., Tonic Wholesale Inc. d/b/a Ace Wholesale, Dapan USA Corp. d/b/a Frontier Wholesale, and Sung Keun Lee (collectively, the "Elite Parties"). However, over the past few days, all claims in this lawsuit involving the Elite Parties were settled (pending the Court's so-ordering of the settlements). Now, all remaining parties in this case are also parties to the parallel New York action, rendering transfer and consolidation a realistic option for the first time.

3. The standard 35-day notice period for the Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 would require Living Essentials' Motion to be noticed for hearing on December 19, 2013, less than one month before the January 13, 2014 trial date in the present action.

4. The standard 35-day notice period is unnecessary in this instance because all parties to this matter—including the Dan-Dee Defendants (who are the only remaining direct defendants) and all actively litigating third-party defendants—consent to the relief requested.

5. Shortening the time to hear the Living Essentials' Motion alone will have no effect on other deadlines in this case.

6. Justice and efficiency would be best served by having Living Essentials' Motion noticed and heard on an expedited schedule, in light of the upcoming trial date set for January 13, 2014, and the extensive pretrial preparations the parties will be required to make over the coming weeks. Those preparations have now become duplicative of the preparations the parties will be required to make in the New York action, and expedited consideration of this motion would allow the parties to avoid incurring those considerable expenses unnecessarily.

7. Fact discovery in this action closed on October 31, 2013, and expert discovery is now underway. Trial is scheduled for January 13, 2014. Meanwhile, fact discovery in the New York action is scheduled to conclude on January 17, 2014, and expert discovery in that action is scheduled to conclude on May 23, 2014, with trial to follow.

8. As Living Essentials and the Dan-Dee Defendants were already set to appear before the Court on November 14, 2013 at 8:00 am on Defendant Dan-Dee's Motion to Authorize Salaries, the parties have proposed having Living Essentials' Notice of Motion and Motion for Change of Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 heard at that date and time. Yesterday, Dan-Dee withdrew its Motion to Authorize Salaries; the parties respectfully request that the instant Motion be heard on November 14 in its stead, assuming the Court remains available.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Change of Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 shall be heard on shortened time on November 14, 2013, at 8:00 a.m, or the earliest available date with the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer