Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kuntz v. John Crane Inc., :19-cv-00752-JAM-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190607730 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR CRANE CO. TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LR 144(a) JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiffs WILLIAM KUNTZ and MARY KUNTZ ("Plaintiffs") and Crane Co., hereby stipulate, through their counsel of record, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Crane Co., through their respective attorneys, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 144(a), that the time for Crane Co. to answer Plaintiffs' Complaint here
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR CRANE CO. TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LR 144(a)

Plaintiffs WILLIAM KUNTZ and MARY KUNTZ ("Plaintiffs") and Crane Co., hereby stipulate, through their counsel of record, as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Crane Co., through their respective attorneys, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 144(a), that the time for Crane Co. to answer Plaintiffs' Complaint herein is and shall be extended from May 28, 2019 to June 21, 2019. This is the initial extension of time for Crane Co. to respond to the Complaint, and no parties other than Plaintiffs and Crane Co. are affected by this stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer