Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barefield v. HSBC Holdings, 1:18-cv-0527-LJO-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190619865 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 93) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 17, 2019, all remaining parties to the litigation stipulated to dismiss this action in its entirety and with prejudice. (Doc. 93) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all remaining parties signed the stipulation, it "automatically
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 93)

On June 17, 2019, all remaining parties to the litigation stipulated to dismiss this action in its entirety and with prejudice. (Doc. 93) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all remaining parties signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer