Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC,, 8:12CV122. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20150224d26 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the parties' proposed permanent redactions (Filing No. 520 ) to the trial transcript. Pursuant to its previous order (Filing No. 500 ), the Court finds as follows. To the extent that the parties agree to the proposed redactions, the Court will order those portions of the transcript redacted. The parties only contest one portion of the transcript. The Court will adopt AT&T's proposed redactions. The court repor
More

ORDER

LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' proposed permanent redactions (Filing No. 520) to the trial transcript. Pursuant to its previous order (Filing No. 500), the Court finds as follows.

To the extent that the parties agree to the proposed redactions, the Court will order those portions of the transcript redacted. The parties only contest one portion of the transcript. The Court will adopt AT&T's proposed redactions. The court reporter shall apply these redactions and then file the final, redacted transcript within twenty-one days of this order.

IT IS ORDERED:

1) The parties' uncontested redactions are adopted.

2) AT&T's redactions for the only contested portion of the transcript are adopted.

3) The Court Reporter shall file the final, redacted transcript within twenty-one days of this order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer