Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, C 18-03748 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190819515
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Our court of appeals has referred this matter to the undersigned judge for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for pro se plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva (Dkt. No. 179). There is no evidence that plaintiff's financial position has changed significantly since she was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant action. Moreover, while plaintiff's c
Summary: ORDER RE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Our court of appeals has referred this matter to the undersigned judge for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for pro se plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva (Dkt. No. 179). There is no evidence that plaintiff's financial position has changed significantly since she was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant action. Moreover, while plaintiff's ca..
More
ORDER RE IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Our court of appeals has referred this matter to the undersigned judge for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for pro se plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva (Dkt. No. 179). There is no evidence that plaintiff's financial position has changed significantly since she was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant action. Moreover, while plaintiff's case is weak, the Court cannot say that plaintiff's appeal is so frivolous or insincere as to deny continued in forma pauperis status. Accordingly, this order finds that she may proceed in forma pauperis on her pending appeal. The Clerk shall please notify the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
