Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WAGDA v. TOWN OF DANVILLE, 16-cv-00488-MMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171010673 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN Re: Dkt. No. 93 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On December 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses," and noticed the motion for hearing on February 10, 2017. In the interim, the Court, by order filed January 3, 2017, approved the parties' stipulation to defer briefing and hearing on plaintiff's motion pending the Court's resolution of defendants' earlier-filed motion for judgment on the pleadings, and directed the parties to s
More

ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN

Re: Dkt. No. 93

On December 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses," and noticed the motion for hearing on February 10, 2017. In the interim, the Court, by order filed January 3, 2017, approved the parties' stipulation to defer briefing and hearing on plaintiff's motion pending the Court's resolution of defendants' earlier-filed motion for judgment on the pleadings, and directed the parties to submit, within seven days of the issuance of an order resolving defendants' motion, a revised briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion.

Thereafter, on May 26, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. To date, however, no revised briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to strike has been filed, nor has plaintiff otherwise indicated an intent to proceed thereon.

Under the circumstances, plaintiff's motion to strike is hereby deemed withdrawn.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer