Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dat Thanh Luong v. Alameda County, 3:17-cv-06675-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181002g46 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, the newly individually named County of Alameda employee defendants to the First Amended Complaint are expected to be represented by the same counsel as the previously individually named County of Alameda employee defendants and defendant County of Alameda; WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid the filing of unnecessary or duplicative papers for multiple defendant
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, the newly individually named County of Alameda employee defendants to the First Amended Complaint are expected to be represented by the same counsel as the previously individually named County of Alameda employee defendants and defendant County of Alameda;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid the filing of unnecessary or duplicative papers for multiple defendants;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs, Defendants the County of Alameda, Sheriff Greg Ahern, Jail Commander Thomas Madigan; Dr. Rinata Wagle, and Bonnie Cook (collectively "County Defendants") that the time for filing a responsive pleading by these Defendants shall be extended to the time provided under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following service of the last newly named County employed defendant in the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of the other signatory to the filing of this document.

/s/ Timothy P. Murphy ________________________________ TIMOTHY P. MURPHY
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer