Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DOE EX REL. ROE v. MORAGA SCHOOL DISTRICT, 3:17-cv-00057-CRB. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170907729 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE CHARLES BREYER , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by plaintiff and defendants, through their respective counsel of record, that the complaint brought by plaintiff, as against defendants, Moraga School District, Amy Black and Mildred Tang, should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties further stipulate that each party with to this stipulation of dismissal bear their own attorney's fees, expenses a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

It is hereby stipulated by plaintiff and defendants, through their respective counsel of record, that the complaint brought by plaintiff, as against defendants, Moraga School District, Amy Black and Mildred Tang, should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties further stipulate that each party with to this stipulation of dismissal bear their own attorney's fees, expenses and cost.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer