ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 10-CV-4892-RS. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131218b64
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT TERMINATING THIS ACTION OR TO FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to the Court's December 9, 2013 Order, see ECF No. 78, the parties submit the following status report to apprise the Court of their efforts to resolve a potential dispute about the scope of the Court's summary judgment order. ECF No. 77. The parties, through their counsel, met and conferred on December 9 and December
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT TERMINATING THIS ACTION OR TO FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to the Court's December 9, 2013 Order, see ECF No. 78, the parties submit the following status report to apprise the Court of their efforts to resolve a potential dispute about the scope of the Court's summary judgment order. ECF No. 77. The parties, through their counsel, met and conferred on December 9 and December 1..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT TERMINATING THIS ACTION OR TO FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's December 9, 2013 Order, see ECF No. 78, the parties submit the following status report to apprise the Court of their efforts to resolve a potential dispute about the scope of the Court's summary judgment order. ECF No. 77. The parties, through their counsel, met and conferred on December 9 and December 16, 2013, but have not yet been able to come to agreement on all outstanding matters that remain in contention. The parties believe that additional time will assist them in their efforts to resolve the current impasse. In light of the upcoming holidays, the parties have stipulated to and request that within 30 days, or no later than January 15, 2013, the parties will either file a proposed judgment terminating this action or file a joint status report clarifying any issues that remain in dispute which require court intervention to resolve. The requested change will not affect any other dates in the present schedule.
Pursuant to stipulation, by no later than January 15, 2014, the parties shall either jointly file a proposed judgment terminating this action, of if the parties cannot agree on the terms of a proposed judgment, then the parties shall file a status report setting forth the nature of the parties' dispute that requires court intervention.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle