Griffin v. Kelso, 2:10-cv-2525 MCE AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190826712
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. 1 ECF Nos. 131-35. Review of the opposition has revealed that the declarations of plaintiff and of Dr. Gregory Taylor have not been properly signed. As counsel has been advised on two prior occasions, a non-attorney's electronic signature must comply with Local Rule 131(f). See ECF Nos. 81, 85. Here both signatures a
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. 1 ECF Nos. 131-35. Review of the opposition has revealed that the declarations of plaintiff and of Dr. Gregory Taylor have not been properly signed. As counsel has been advised on two prior occasions, a non-attorney's electronic signature must comply with Local Rule 131(f). See ECF Nos. 81, 85. Here both signatures ar..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment.1 ECF Nos. 131-35. Review of the opposition has revealed that the declarations of plaintiff and of Dr. Gregory Taylor have not been properly signed. As counsel has been advised on two prior occasions, a non-attorney's electronic signature must comply with Local Rule 131(f). See ECF Nos. 81, 85. Here both signatures are missing a statement that counsel has a signed original in his possession, and Dr. Taylor's signature also does not include a "/s/" before his name. Plaintiff will be provided with an opportunity as to each declaration to either submit a statement that counsel is in possession of the original, signed declaration or provide a copy of the signed original. Failure as to either declaration will result in that declaration being disregarded. Defendants' deadline to reply shall remain unchanged.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall have three days from the service of this order to either submit a statement that counsel is in possession of the signed original declarations submitted at ECF Nos. 133 and 135, or to provide a copy of the signed originals. Failure as to either declaration to file an appropriate statement or a copy of the original will result in that declaration being disregarded.
FootNotes
1. The court notes that the opposition was filed one day late. Given the brief nature of the untimeliness, the opposition will be accepted. However, counsel is advised that in the future untimely filings must be accompanied by a motion for leave to file untimely, or they may be stricken from the record.
Source: Leagle
