Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SRAN v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, C-15-4471-JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170427c23 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT REBUTTAL AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . RECITALS WHEREAS the parties have exchanged written discovery and substantial documents in the case, conducted numerous witness depositions, and otherwise diligently worked together to move the case forward; WHEREAS the current deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is May 1, 2017; WHEREAS the current expert discovery cutoff is May 15, 2017; WHEREAS the par
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT REBUTTAL AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES

RECITALS

WHEREAS the parties have exchanged written discovery and substantial documents in the case, conducted numerous witness depositions, and otherwise diligently worked together to move the case forward;

WHEREAS the current deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is May 1, 2017;

WHEREAS the current expert discovery cutoff is May 15, 2017;

WHEREAS the parties are in the process of completing substantial expert witness discovery;

WHEREAS both parties anticipate disclosing rebuttal expert witnesses;

WHEREAS both parties anticipate taking multiple expert witness depositions;

WHEREAS the parties have identified an issue impacting the scope of testimony to be provided by expert witnesses relating to the issue of damages and therefore require additional time to meet and confer about the issue so as to reach a possible agreement;

WHEREAS the parties need additional time to meaningfully conduct expert witness discovery thereafter;

WHEREAS the parties are still in active settlement negotiations with Justice Lambden of ADR Services following mediation on November 15, 2016, and would like to continue participating in settlement discussions;

WHEREAS the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the current expert discovery deadlines as outlined by the parties below, or as soon thereafter as the Court is available.

WHEREAS the continuance of the deadlines as proposed below will not impact the August 14, 2017 trial date, or any other deadlines set by this Court.

WHEREAS, alternatively, the parties request a CMC to further discuss these issues with the Court.

STIPULATION

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT the expert rebuttal and expert discovery cutoff deadlines are continued as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed Date Expert rebuttal May 1, 2017 June 16, 2017 Expert Discovery Cutoff May 15, 2017 June 30, 2017

[PROPOSED] ORDER

According to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the expert rebuttal and expert discovery cutoff deadlines of this matter are hereby continued as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed Date Expert rebuttal May 1, 2017 June 16, 2017 Expert Discovery Cutoff May 15, 2017 June 30, 2017

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer