Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 24th day of March, 2014, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #56), and the objections thereto. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows: 1. The plaintiff George Robinson filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55). 2. U.S. Magistrate Judge Marschewski, in his Report and Recommendation, recommended that the motion be denied. (Doc. 5
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 24th day of March, 2014, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #56), and the objections thereto. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows: 1. The plaintiff George Robinson filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55). 2. U.S. Magistrate Judge Marschewski, in his Report and Recommendation, recommended that the motion be denied. (Doc. 56..
More
ORDER
JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.
Now on this 24th day of March, 2014, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #56), and the objections thereto. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows:
1. The plaintiff George Robinson filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)(Doc. 55).
2. U.S. Magistrate Judge Marschewski, in his Report and Recommendation, recommended that the motion be denied. (Doc. 56)
3. The plaintiff filed timely objections in which he states that it would be a financial hardship to pay the appeal fee. (Doc. 57)
4. After a review of the matter, the Court finds that plaintiff's objections offer nothing either in law or fact which would warrant rejection of the Report and Recommendation. The objections of the plaintiff (document #57) will, therefore, be overruled and the Report and Recommendation will be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED
* that the objections of the plaintiff (document #57) to the Report And Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge should be, and they hereby are, overruled;
* that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #56) should be, and it hereby is, adopted in toto; and
* that the motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 55) is denied and the plaintiff is directed to pay the appellate filing fee of $505.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
