BUSCH v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 4:12-cv-77-DPM. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120502901
Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Having applied the statutory factors and the precedent, the Court concludes that the Western District is the most convenient for all concerned and is where this case needs to be. 28 U.S.C. 1404(a); Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp., 119 F.3d 688 , 695-97 (8th Cir. 1997). Everything at issue happened at Wal-Mart's home office; and the only thing tying this case to the Eastern District is Busch's decision to file here. While th
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Having applied the statutory factors and the precedent, the Court concludes that the Western District is the most convenient for all concerned and is where this case needs to be. 28 U.S.C. 1404(a); Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp., 119 F.3d 688 , 695-97 (8th Cir. 1997). Everything at issue happened at Wal-Mart's home office; and the only thing tying this case to the Eastern District is Busch's decision to file here. While thi..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
Having applied the statutory factors and the precedent, the Court concludes that the Western District is the most convenient for all concerned and is where this case needs to be. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp., 119 F.3d 688, 695-97 (8th Cir. 1997). Everything at issue happened at Wal-Mart's home office; and the only thing tying this case to the Eastern District is Busch's decision to file here. While this choice is entitled to weight, it is not dispositive. Lewis v. United Parcel Service, No. 4:09-cv-887-JMM, 2010 WL 654295, at *2 (E.D. Ark. 17 Feb. 2010). The Court understands Busch's concerns about assignment within the Western District. But some judge will be picked at random to handle the case. The interests of justice are best served by transferring the case. Motion to transfer, Document No. 8, granted. This case is transferred to the Western District of Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. The transfer is immediate because the receiving Court is in the Eighth Circuit too. Cf. In re Nine Mile Limited, 673 F.2d 242 (8th Cir. 1982).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
