Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kharis v. Barr, 3:18-cv-4800-JST. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190401960 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and 7-12, and subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate to continuing the deadlines and hearing date with respect to Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees as follows: Respondents' Opposition (currently due March 29, 2019): April 12, 2019 Petitioner's Reply (currently due April 5, 2019) April 19, 2019 Heari
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and 7-12, and subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate to continuing the deadlines and hearing date with respect to Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees as follows:

Respondents' Opposition (currently due March 29, 2019): April 12, 2019 Petitioner's Reply (currently due April 5, 2019) April 19, 2019 Hearing Date: (currently set for April 25, 2019) May 9, 2019

The reasons for the parties' request is set forth in the attached declaration of Adrienne Zack, as required by Local Rule 6-2(a).

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Respondents' Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is due April 12, 2019. Petitioner's Reply is due April 19, 2019. The hearing currently set for April 25, 2019, is continued to May 9, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer