PRENTICE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, C 12-05856 MEJ. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130802735
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Nancy Prentice and Colin Haughin and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporatio ("Amtrak"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended C
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Nancy Prentice and Colin Haughin and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporatio ("Amtrak"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Co..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Nancy Prentice and Colin Haughin and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporatio ("Amtrak"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint to August 8, 2013. Defendant Amtrak requests that such extension be granted by the Court because Defendant requires additional time to research the factual allegations raised in the Second Amended Complaint and resolve whether Amtrak is contractually obligated to indemnify newly named Defendant Union Pacific.
ORDER
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested herein, the Court hereby makes the foregoing Stipulation the Order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
