Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

A.P. v. Community Care Licensing, 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170509721 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective attorneys and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications and/or amendments to this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated November 24, 2014 [ECF No. 60]: • That the expert witness disclosure deadline, currently set for June 8, 2017, be moved to July 8, 2017; • That the supple
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective attorneys and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications and/or amendments to this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated November 24, 2014 [ECF No. 60]:

• That the expert witness disclosure deadline, currently set for June 8, 2017, be moved to July 8, 2017; • That the supplemental expert witness disclosure deadline, currently set for June 29, 2017, be moved to July 29, 2017; • That the completion of phase II discovery, currently set for July 24, 2017, be moved to September 1, 2017; • That the deadline for filing dispositive motions, currently set for July 27, 2016, be moved to October 19, 2017; • That the deadline for filing phase II dispositive motions, currently set for August 24, 2017, be moved to October 10, 2017; • That the deadline for hearing phase II dispositive motions, currently set for September 26, 2017, be moved to November 7, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have met and discussed the posture of this case, and agree that it would be in the interests of justice as set forth in the Declaration of John Lavra filed herewith that good causes exists for a modification of the scheduling order;

WHEREAS, this stipulation and proposed order is based on the need for additional time to conduct the above mentioned discovery, complete written discovery, and file pretrial motions;

WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other improper purpose; and

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties that this Court modifies the pretrial deadlines and trial date as set forth above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer