Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paige v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:18-cv-01359-RFB-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180820d48 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Mark G. Paige ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Seterus, Inc. ("Seterus") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On July 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Seterus was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on July 26, 2018. Based on the above service, Seterus' answer or responsive pleading i
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff, Mark G. Paige ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Seterus, Inc. ("Seterus") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

On July 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Seterus was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on July 26, 2018. Based on the above service, Seterus' answer or responsive pleading is due on or before August 16, 2018. The Parties have discussed extending the deadline for Seterus to respond to the complaint.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Seterus to file its responsive pleading to September 6, 2018.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Seterus to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties request this extension in order to explore the claims of the case and discuss possible resolution. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer